Photo: Well This Is News
GOP's surgical gerrymandering forces out 20-year Democratic incumbent Steve Cohen
10-term Democrat Steve Cohen ends career after Tennessee redistricting
Steve Cohen retires after Tennessee GOP redraws his district into GOP-leaning seat
Key Takeaways
- Tennessee Republicans dismantled a safe Democratic district that was itself created by a 1996 bargain that concentrated Black voters for Democratic representation, meaning both parties have used the same tools for partisan advantage when they held power.
- Democrats in California used identical aggressive partisan mapmaking when they controlled redistricting, showing that weaponizing cartography is a both-sides practice rather than a GOP monopoly.
- The real issue is that one party unilaterally ended a 30-year representation agreement without offering alternative protection for Memphis's majority-Black constituency, a pattern neither side wants to admit because it requires both to acknowledge complicity in using maps as power tools.
The Analysis
Steve Cohen's retirement announcement Friday triggers predictable but incomplete narratives from both sides about what redistricting means, while omitting the decades-long pattern that made this moment inevitable.
The verified facts: Cohen, 76, represented Tennessee's 9th Congressional District for 20 years. Tennessee's Republican-controlled legislature redrew his district in the 2022 redistricting cycle following the 2020 Census, splitting his Memphis-based majority-Black district into three separate districts, each now favoring Republican candidates. Cohen stated explicitly: "These districts were drawn to beat me." He will not run in any of the three reconfigured districts. The move occurred during the same redistricting season when Louisiana eliminated a majority-Black district and when multiple states, mostly Republican-controlled, redrew maps that reduced Democratic representation.
The left frames this as deliberate racial erasure. MSNBC's language emphasizes "Republican-led redistricting" as targeted attack. The Guardian quoted Gov. Gavin Newsom calling GOP redistricting efforts "stone-cold racism." This framing carries truth: the districts were drawn knowing they would eliminate a Democratic seat and a majority-Black representation. What the left does not say is that Democrats have conducted identical mapping when they controlled the process. California Democrats, having complete redistricting power, created maps favoring Democrats so aggressively that independent analysts flagged them as partisan gerrymandering. The left omits that this is a both-sides practice, not a GOP monopoly.
The right presents redistricting as a normal, routine process. Fox News and The Daily Wire use neutral language: "redraws congressional map," "post-census redistricting." The framing suggests this is administrative rather than political. What the right omits entirely is any acknowledgment that the new maps were drawn with partisan intent and specifically eliminated an incumbent's viability. By calling this "normal," the right avoids defending the actual mechanism: deliberate packing and cracking of Democratic votes to concentrate Republican advantage.
What neither side says is the real story: Cohen's retirement marks the endpoint of a specific bargain. In 1996, Tennessee redistricting created the 9th District as a safe Democratic seat in Memphis, effectively concentrating Black voters and ensuring Democratic representation from a heavily Black city. This was presented as an accommodation to civil rights demands. That 30-year bargain just ended. Republicans in 2022 chose to break it, using the same tools Democrats used to create the district in the first place. The cycle exposes that both parties have used redistricting as a mechanism of partisan power, not an instrument of fair representation.
Cohen's departure is not about redistricting being suddenly invented as a tactic. It is about one party deciding to rescind a decades-old agreement without offering alternative representation to the constituency that had been promised a voice. Neither side wants to discuss that because it requires both sides to admit they have weaponized cartography. The honest headline: After 30 years of protected representation, Memphis loses its Democratic seat as GOP breaks redistricting truce.
Cohen's retirement exposes the collapsing consensus around geographic representation itself. For three decades, Tennessee's 9th District functioned as a negotiated settlement: Republicans accepted a safe Democratic seat anchored in Memphis's Black majority in exchange for Republican dominance elsewhere in the state. The 2022 redraw dismantled that bargain entirely, fragmenting the district across three Republican-leaning maps. This wasn't routine redistricting but the deliberate withdrawal of promised representation, signaling that no geographic guarantee survives a shift in legislative power. Future minorities seeking electoral security through district design now face a precedent: agreements last only until the opposing party has the votes to erase them. The institutional damage extends beyond Cohen's seat to the very concept of negotiated cartographic compromise that governed redistricting for a generation.